Tonight, back with the Horror Book Club. This time, it was The Ballad of Black Tom, based on the Lovecraft story, The Horror at Red Hook, but told from the perspective of a black man. I managed to get through the club's book, and read the entirety of the story it's based on, which is much shorter - and less coherent. Again, the meeting was in the Prince of Wales, Covent Garden. Question is, would the kitchen be open..?
I went in time to get something to eat beforehand - still didn't manage to get there first! Hallelujah, the kitchen was open - and people dribbled down at both breaks to order food. Most arrived late, what with all the transport strikes. Interestingly, the lady who took my order, when she asked for my table number, didn't know how to handle "upstairs"! (The club always books the upstairs room.) She had to get a more senior colleague to help - there were to be many more orders for "upstairs", though, so I guess she learned.
My meal was unusually disappointing, for a Greene King pub. Yes, the pie was the same - but it came with mushy peas, which I hate. And on top of the peas, the pie was plonked! so I ended up not finishing it, for the taste of the peas. Not only that, but there isn't a choice of mash or chips, as in The Lucas Arms - no, when I ordered chips, I ended up getting them in a separate bowl! And they were way too salty - when someone else got her meal, complete with chips, she spent the first few minutes shaking the salt off the top ones. So I didn't finish those, either. I will probably eat here again - but not the pie.
And so to the book discussion. I actually started quite the debate, saying that I found the change of narration jarring. Cue a lengthy debate about how necessary it was - with which I completely agree! and for the same reasons. All I meant was that I found it clumsily done - I'd have introduced the second narrator more gradually. But hey. Interestingly, when it came time to give our scores at the end, someone suggested, out of interest, that we also detail how much Lovecraft we've read previously! There wasn't much correlation between that and the scores, though. But as we concluded, previous knowledge of Lovecraft isn't necessary to enjoy this book. Generally very well-received - the only score under 7 came from someone who didn't think this qualified as horror; cue another discussion about how different folks see horror differently. Horror, like comedy, remains highly subjective.
And so home, nice n early.
No comments:
Post a Comment